SC Registry Declines Kejriwal's Plea for Urgent Hearing on Bail Extension
The Supreme Court registry has declined Arvind Kejriwal's plea for an urgent hearing on bail extension, marking a setback in his legal battle. In this video, we delve into the details of the Supreme Court's decision and the implications for Kejriwal's case. We analyze the reasons behind the denial of the plea and the potential impact on Kejriwal's legal strategy.
Supreme Court Registry Rejects Urgent Hearing for Kejriwal's Plea on Extending Interim Bail
The leader of the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP), who was granted temporary release from judicial custody on May 10 to participate in Lok Sabha election campaigning, has been instructed by the highest court to report back to jail on June 2.
In a setback for Delhi's chief minister, Arvind Kejriwal, the Supreme Court registry declined his request for an urgent hearing before a vacation bench on Wednesday. Kejriwal sought a one-week extension of his 21-day interim bail on medical grounds in the Delhi excise policy case. The registry deemed Kejriwal's plea "not maintainable" and referred to earlier Supreme Court orders that restricted his temporary bail until June 1, giving him the option to pursue regular bail from the trial court.
The leader of the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP), who was released from judicial custody on May 10 to participate in Lok Sabha election campaigning, has been instructed by the highest court to report back to jail on June 2.
Kejriwal's legal team is currently exploring their options considering the significant legal hurdle faced by the Delhi CM. Following the Supreme Court's previous directive, one possibility is to seek regular bail from the trial court.
Earlier this week, Kejriwal appealed to the top court for an extension of his bail, citing the urgent need for medical examinations, including PET-CT scans and Holter monitoring, to assess potential serious health issues.
A day ago, senior counsel Abhishek Manu Singhvi, representing Kejriwal, brought up the extension plea before the vacation bench consisting of justices JK Maheshwari and KV Viswanathan. However, the bench declined to grant an urgent hearing, stating that it would be more appropriate for the Chief Justice of India (CJI) to decide on the matter, as proceedings in Kejriwal's petition have already concluded for judgment.
Subsequently, Kejriwal's legal team attempted to have the plea listed before a bench through the court registry, but their efforts were unsuccessful. The registry deemed the plea "not maintainable" and referred to previous orders that clearly outlined the terms of Kejriwal's temporary release. It emphasized that any further requests for bail should be directed to the trial court.
Additionally, it was noted that the Chief Minister (CM) was granted the freedom to seek regular bail from the trial court without any prejudice to his rights and arguments. This directive came after a bench of justices Sanjiv Khanna and Dipankar Datta of the top court reserved its judgment on Kejriwal's plea to invalidate his arrest by the Enforcement Directorate (ED).
What's Your Reaction?